The New Flesh. A Marcusean Dialectic of Eros and Technology in the Digital Age
Palavras-chave:
Marcuse, Eros, Technology, Technics, InternetResumo
In this article, we offer a critical theory of the internet grounded in Marcuse’s dialectical theory of technology, starting from what we contend to be the fundamental and indispensable core of his thinking: the dialectic between eros and technological rationality. We proceed below in three parts: First, we critically reconstruct Marcuse’s dialectic of eros and technological rationality to set the stage for our discussion of the internet. Second, we use Marcuse’s distinction between technology and technics to interrogate the internet as a material reflection of the social process out of which it emerged. Under conditions of advanced industrial civilization, it is not surprising that the internet appears as a material reflection of technological rationality. In the final section, we seek to answer the questions raised by the preceding sections: If the internet frustrates our need for erotic connection, rendering desire one-dimensional, would an erotic technology of liberation include the internet? If so, would that internet look anything like what it does now?
Downloads
Referências
ADORNO, Theodor (1991): “Resignation.” In Theodor Adorno: The Culture Industry. New York: Routledge, 198-203.
BARLOW, John Perry (1996): “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace.” Electronic Frontier Foundation. Accessed 15/7/2025: https://www.wired.com/1997/09/newrules/
CRARY, Jonathan (2022): Scorched earth: Beyond the digital age to a post-capitalist world. New York: Verso books.
CRONENBERG, David. (Director): (1983): Videodrome. Universal City: Universal Pictures.
CROWE, C. L., LIU, L., BAGNAROL, N., & FRIED, L. P. (2024): Loneliness prevention and the role of the public health system. Perspectives in public health, 144 (1), 31-38.
DEAN, Jodi (2003): Why the Net is not a Public Sphere. Constellations: An International Journal Of Critical & Democratic Theory, Vol. 10(1), 95-112.
DELLA TORRE, Bruna (2024): “21st Century One-Dimensionality: Bit Technologi¬cal Rationality, Digital Culture Industry, and Platform Postmodernity.” In Eduardo Altheman C. Santos, Jina Fast, Nicole K. Mayberry, and Sid Simpson (eds): The Marcusean Mind. New York: Routledge, 510-521.
DUFFY, Clare (2024): “‘There are no guardrails.’ This mom believes an AI chatbot is responsible for her son’s suicide.” CNN. Accessed 15/7/2025: https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/30/tech/teen-suicide-character-ai-lawsuit
FEENBERG, Andrew (2008): “Critical theory of technology: An overview.” In Gloria J. Leckie and John E. Buschman, (eds.): Information technology in librarianship: New critical approaches. Bloomsbury Publishing, 31-46.
FEENBERG, Andrew (2017): Technosystem: The social life of reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
FUCHS, Christian (2016): Critical theory of communication: New readings of Lukács, Adorno, Marcuse, Honneth and Habermas in the age of the internet. University of Westminster Press.
GARLICK, Steve (2011): “Complexity, Masculinity, and Critical Theory: Revisiting Marcuse on Technology, Eros, and Nature.” Critical Sociology. Vol 39(2), 223-238.
HORKHEIMER, Max, ADORNO, Theodor W. (2002): Dialectic of enlightenment. Noeri, Gunzelin (trans). Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
KELLY, Kevin (1997): “New Rules for the New Economy.” Wired. Accessed 7/15/2025: https://www.wired.com/1997/09/newrules/
MARCUSE, Herbert ([1941] 1998): "Some social implications of modern technology." In Herbert Marcuse: Technology, War, and Fascism. New York: Routledge, p. 39-65.
MARCUSE, Herbert (1964): One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
MARCUSE, Herbert (1965): "Industrialization and Capitalism in the Work of Max Weber.” In Negations: Essays in Critical Theory. London: Allen Lane, 201-226.
MARCUSE, Herbert (1966): Eros and Civilization. Boston: Beacon Press.
MARCUSE, Herbert (1969): An Essay on Liberation. Boston: Beacon Press.
MARCUSE, Herbert ([1979] 2011): "Children of Prometheus: 25 Theses on Technology and Society." In Herbert Marcuse: Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, and Emancipation. New York: Routledge, 222-225.
NEGROPONTE, Nicholas (1995): Being Digital. New York: Knopf.
SIMPSON, Sid (2024): “Dialectics of Domination and Eros: Herbert Marcuse and the Critique of Technological Rationality.” In Eduardo Altheman C. Santos, Jina Fast, Nicole K. Mayberry, and Sid Simpson (eds): The Marcusean Mind. New York: Routledge, 137-149.
UNITED NATIONS INSTITUTE FOR TRAINING AND RESEARCH (UNITAR) (2024): “Global E-Waste Monitor 2024: Electronic Waste Rising Five Times Faster than Documented E-Waste Recycling. Accessed 15/7/2025: https://unitar.org/about/news-stories/press/global-e-waste-monitor-2024-electronic-waste-rising-five-times-faster-documented-e-waste-recycling
WEISSBOURD, Richard, Milena BATANOVA, Virginia LOVISON, and Eric TORRES (2021): “Loneliness in America: How the Pandemic Has Deepened an Epidemic of Loneliness and What We Can Do About It.” Making Caring Common Project. Accessed 15/7/2025: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b7c56e255b02c683659fe43/t/6021776bdd04957c4557c212/1612805995893/Loneliness+in+America+2021_02_08_FINAL.pdf
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Sid Simpson, Savannah Sima
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
1. Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
2. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
3. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Confidencialidad de los datos
1. Constelaciones. Revista de Teoría Crítica garantiza que los datos que nos envíe serán utilizados únicamente para atender sus demandas manifestadas en este mensaje.
2. Sus datos no serán cedidos a terceros.
3. Cuando lo desee puede solicitar que sus datos sean eliminados de nuestros registros.
