LA TEORÍA DE LA REVOLUCIÓN INTERSTICIAL DE JOHN HOLLOWAY

Autors/ores

Paraules clau:

teoria critica, revolución, Holloway.

Resum

La obra de John Holloway abarca cuatro décadas de desarrollo intelectual y compromiso con el cambio radical. Su trabajo se desarrolló en el contexto de laConference of Socialist Economist(CSE) y fue fundamental para la creación del Marxismo Abierto. Este artículo presenta lo que voy a denominar la teoría de la revolución intersticialla cual, parafraseando a Holloway, produjo una ‘grieta’ en las teorías y praxis marxistas, autónomas y radicales. Comienzo con un relato de la vida y la trayectoria intelectual de John Holloway para marcar los caminos a través de los cuales se comienza a articular esta teoría crítica, a través de un trabajo de años. Luego discuto la “teoría de la revolución intersticial”, presentada los dos ultimos libros de Holloway: Change the World without Taking Power: The Meaning of Revolution Today (CTWWTP) (2002) y Crack Capitalism(2010). Concluyo que el trabajo de Holloway es pionero tanto para la teoría crítica como para la praxis anticapitalista 

Descàrregues

Les dades de descàrrega encara no estan disponibles.

Biografia de l'autor/a

Ana Cecilia Dinerstein, University of Bath

Reader in Sociology, Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath. She studied at the University of Buenos Aires, and the University of Warwick where she received her doctorate. She is a Fellow of the Higer Education Academy. She teaches critical theory at the University of Bath, UK. Her research on the global politics of hope connects critical theory with movements’ autonomous praxis. Her publications include The Politics of Autonomy in Latin America: The Art of Organising Hope (Palgrave McMillan, 2015), Social Sciences for An-Other Politics. Women Theorising without Parachutes, (Palgrave McMillan, 2016), and The Labour Debate: An Investigation into the Theory and Reality of Capitalist Work, (Routledge 2002 co-edited with M. Neary). Her co-authored books A world beyond work? Automation, Basic Income and Bad Utopias, Emerald (with F.H. Pitts) and Opening Fronts of Political Possibility, OM Press) with S. Amsler, are forthcoming.

E-mail address: A.C.Dinerstein@bath.ac.uk

https://www.anaceciliadinerstein.com

https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/persons/ana-cecilia-dinerstein

 

 

Referències

Adorno, T.W. (2005/1974) Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life. London: Verso.

Adorno, T.W. (1995) Negative Dialectics. New York: Continuum.

Amsler, S. (2016) ‘Learning hope: An epistemology of possibility for advanced capitalist society’. In Dinerstein, A.C. (2017) (Ed.) Social Science for an Other Politics: Women Theorizing without Parachutes. Basingstoke: Palgrave: 19–32.

Bensaïd, D. (2005) ‘On a recent book by John Hol- loway’, Historical Materialism 13(4): 169–92. Bieler, A., Bonefeld, W., Burnham, P., and Morton, A. (2006) Global Restructuring, State, Capital and Labour: Contesting Neo- Gramscian. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Bloch, E. (1986 [1959]) The Principle of Hope. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Boldyrev, I. (2015) Ernst Bloch and his Contem- poraries: Locating Utopian Messianism. London: Bloomsbury.

Bonefeld, W. (1995) ‘Capital as subject and the existence of labour’. In Bonefeld, W., Gunn, R., Psychopedis, K., and Holloway, J. (1995) (Eds.) Open Marxism, Vol. 3. London: Pluto Press: 182–212.

Bonefeld, W. (1994) ‘Human practice and per- version: Beyond autonomy and structure’, Common Sense 15: 43–52.

Bonefeld, W. and Holloway, J. (Eds.) (1991) Post-Fordism and Social Form. London: Macmillan.

Bonefeld, W., Gunn, R., and Psychopedis, K. (Eds.) (1992a) Open Marxism, Vol. 2. London: Pluto Press.

Bonefeld, W., Gunn, R., and Psychopedis, K. (Eds.) (1992b) Open Marxism, Vol. 1. London: Pluto Press.

Bonefeld, W., Gunn, R., Holloway, J., and Psychopedis, K. (Eds.) (1995) Open Marxism, Vol. 3. London: Pluto Press.

Callinicos, A. (2005) ‘Sympathy for the devil? John Holloway’s Mephistophelian Marxism’, Capital & Class 29(1): 17–19.

Clarke, S. (1991a) Marx, Marginalism and Modern Sociology: From Adam Smith to Max Weber. London: Macmillan.

Clarke, S. (1991b) ‘The state debate’. In Clarke, S. (Ed.) The State Debate. Basingstoke: Macmillan: 1–69.

Clarke, S. (1991c) ‘State, class struggle, and the reproduction of capital’. In Clarke, S. (Ed.) The State Debate. Basingstoke: Macmillan: 183–203.

Clarke, S. (1988) Keynesianism, Monetarism and the Crisis of the State. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

Dinerstein, A.C. (2016) ‘Introduction: The radical subject and its critical theory’. In Diner- stein, A.C. (Ed.) Social Science for an Other Politics: Women Theorizing without Para- chutes. Basingstoke: Palgrave: 1–15.

Dinerstein, A.C. (2015) The Politics of Autonomy in Latin America: The Art of Organising Hope. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Dinerstein, A.C. (2012) ‘Interstitial revolution: On the explosive fusion of negativity and hope’, Capital & Class 36(3): 521–40.

Dinerstein, A.C. (2005) ‘Entre el éxtasis y el desencuentro. Los desafíos de la rebelión’. En Holloway, J. et al. (eds.) Marxismo Abierto. Una visión Europea y Latinoamericana. Buenos Aires, Herramienta Ediciones.

Dinerstein, A.C. (2009) ‘Recobrando la materialidad: el desempleo y la subjetividad invisible del trabajo’ En El trabajo en Debate. Investigación teórica y empírica del trabajo capitalista, Herramienta, Buenos Aires.

Dinerstein, A.C. (2000), ‘Subjetividad: capital y la materialidad abstracta del poder (Foucault y el Marxismo Abierto)’. En Borón, A. (ed.) Teoría y Filosofía Política. La Tradición Clásica y las Nuevas Fronteras, Buenos Aires: CLACSO-Eudeba: 251-272.

Dinerstein, A.C. (1999) 'Sujeto y Globalización: la experiencia de la Abstracción', Doxa 20: 87-106

Dinerstein, A.C. and Neary, M. (Eds.) (2002a) The Labour Debate. An InvestigatIon into the theory and reality of capitalist work, Aldershot: Ashgate.

Dinerstein, A.C. and Neary, M. (2002b) ‘From here to Utopia: Finding inspiration for the labour debate’. In Dinerstein, A.C. and Neary, M. (Eds.) The Labour Debate… Alder- shot: Ashgate: 1–26.

Dinerstein, A.C. and Picciotto, S. (1998) ‘Conversation with Sol Picciotto: The political and economic forms of the new phase of the internationalisation of capital, Interview’, Doxa. Cuadernos de Ciencias Sociales 18: 87–93.

Esteva, G. (1999) ‘The Zapatistas and people’s power’, Capital & Class 32(2): 153–68.

Gunn, R. (1992) ‘Against historical materialism: Marxism as first-order discourse’. In Bonefeld et al. (Eds.) Open Marxism, Vol. 2. London: Pluto Press: 1–45.

Gunn, R. (1991) ‘Marxism and common sense’, Common Sense 11: 79–100.

Gunn, R. (1987) ‘Notes on “class”’, Common Sense 2: 15–25.

Hardt, M. and Holloway, J. (2012) ‘Creating common wealth and cracking capitalism: A cross-reading’, Herramienta 49, www.her- ramienta.com.ar; accessed 15 May 2012.

Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2000) Empire. Cam- bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Holloway, J. (2010a) Crack Capitalism. London: Pluto Press.

Holloway, J. (2010b) ‘Cracks and the crisis of abstract labour’, Antipode 42(4): 909–23.

Holloway, J. (2009a) ‘Why Adorno?’. In Hollo- way, J., Matamoros, F., and Tischler, S. (Eds.) Negativity and Revolution: Adorno and Polit- ical Activism. London: Pluto: 12–17.

Holloway, J. (2009b) ‘Negative and positive autonomism. Or, Why Adorno? Part 2’. In Holloway, J., Matamoros, F., and Tischler, S. (Eds.) Negativity and Revolution: Adorno and Political Activism. London: Pluto Press: 95–100.

Holloway, J. (2005a) ‘Change the world with- out taking power’, Capital & Class 85: 39–42.

Holloway, J. (2005b) ‘No’, Historical Material- ism 13(4): 265–84.

Holloway, J. (2005c) ‘Going in the wrong direction or Mephistopheles: Not Saint Francis of Assisi’, libcom.org, 16/12/2005, https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=)+%E2%80%98Going+in+the+wrong+direction+or+Mephistopheles:+Not+Saint+Francis+of+Assisi%E2%80%99,+libcom.org&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

Holloway, J. (2002a) Change the World with- out Taking Power: The Meaning of Revolution Today. London: Pluto Press.

Holloway, J. (2002b) ‘Zapatismo and the social sciences’, Capital & Class 26(3): 153–60.

Holloway, J. (2002c) ‘Class and classification: Against, in and beyond labour’. In Dinerstein, A.C. and Neary, M. (Eds.) The Labour Debate... London: Routledge: 27–40.

Holloway, J. (2002d) ‘Twelve theses on changing the world without taking power’, Commoner 4, http://www.commoner.org.uk/04holloway2.pdf.

Holloway, J. (1997) ‘Dignity and the Zapatistas’, Common Sense 22: 38–42.

Holloway, J. (1996a) ‘The abyss opens: The rise and fall of Keynesianism’. In Bonefeld, W. and Holloway, J. (1996) (Eds.) Global Capital, National State and the Politics of Money. London: Macmillan: 7–34.

Holloway, J. (1996b) ‘Global capital and the national state’. In Bonefeld, W. and Holloway, J. (Eds.) Global Capital, National State and the Politics of Money. London: Macmillan: 116–40.

Holloway, J. (1996c) ‘The concept of power and the Zapatistas’, Common Sense 19: 20–7.

Holloway, J. (1995) ‘From scream of refusal to scream of power: The centrality of work’. In Bonefeld, W., Gunn, R., Holloway, J., and Psychopedis, K. (Eds.) Open Marxism, Vol. 3. London: Pluto Press: 155–81.

Holloway, J. (1994) ‘The relevance of Marxism today’, Common Sense 15: 38–42.

Holloway, J. (1993a) ‘Open Marxism, history and class struggle’, Common Sense 13: 76–86.

Holloway, J. (1993b) ‘The freeing of Marx’, Common Sense 14: 17–21.

Holloway, J. (1992) ‘Crisis, fetishism, class com- position’. In Bonefeld, W. et al. (1992) (Eds.), Open Marxism, Vol. 2. London: Pluto: 145–69.

Holloway, J. (1991) ‘In the beginning was the scream’, Common Sense 11: 69–78.

Holloway, J. (1987) ‘A Note on Fordism and Neo-Fordism’, Common Sense 1: 52–9.

Holloway, J. and Peláez, E. (1998) Zapatista! Reinventing Revolution in Mexico. London: Pluto Press.

Holloway, J. and Picciotto, S. (Eds.) (1978) State and Capital: A Marxist Debate. London: Edward Arnold.

Holloway, J. and Picciotto, S. (1977) ‘Capital, crisis and the state’, Capital & Class 1(2): 76–101.

Holloway, J., Matamoros, F., and Tischler, S. (Eds.) (2009) Negativity and Revolution: Adorno and Political Activism. London: Pluto Press.

Jay, M. (1984) Marxism and Totality: The Adventures of a Concept from Lukács to Habermas. Berkeley, CA: University of Cali- fornia Press.

LEWRG (London Edinburgh Weekend Return Group) (1980) In and Against the State. London: Pluto Press.

Mandel, E. and Agnoli, J. (1980) Offener Marx- ismus – Ein Gespraech ueber Dogmen, Orthodoxie and die Häresie der Realität. Frankurt: Campus.

Marx, Karl (1972) Theories of Surplus Value, Part 3. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

Picciotto, S. (1986) ‘Ten years of Capital & Class’, Capital & Class 10(3): 7–15.

Radice, H. (1980) ‘A short history of the CSE’, Capital & Class 4(1): 43–9.

Stoetzler, M. (2005) ‘On how to make Adorno scream: Some notes on John Holloway’s Change the World without Taking Power’, Historical Materialism 13(4): 193–215.

Thwaites Rey, M. and Dinerstein, A.C. (1994) ‘An Interview with John Holloway: The circu- lation of capital and global class struggle’, Doxa 13: 13–15.

Descàrregues

Arxius addicionals

Publicades

2019-06-11

Com citar

Dinerstein, A. C. (2019). LA TEORÍA DE LA REVOLUCIÓN INTERSTICIAL DE JOHN HOLLOWAY. Constelaciones. Revista De Teoría Crítica, 10, 275–301. Retrieved from https://constelaciones-rtc.net/article/view/3139

Número

Vol. 10 (2018): Violencia socializadora y dinámicas autoritarias en el horizonte de la crisis

Secció

Articles

Llicència

Aquells autors que pugliquin en aquesta revista accepten els següents termes:

  1. Els autors conservaran els seus drets d'autor i garatiran a la revista el dret de primera publicació de la seva obra, la qual estarà simultàniament subjecte a la Llicència de reconeixement de Creative Commons que permet a tercers compartir l'obra sempre que s'indiqui la seva autoria i la seva primera publicació en aquesta revista.
  2. Els autors podran adoptar altres acords de llicància no exclussiva de distribució de la versió de l'obra publicada (p. ex.; depoditar-la en un arxiu telemàtic institucional o publicar-la en un volum monogràfic) sempre que s'indiqui la publicació inicial en aquesta revista.
  3. Es permet i es recomena als autors difondre la seva obra a través de Internet (p. ex.: en arxius telemàtics institucionals o en la seva pàgina web) abans i durant el procés de tramesa, la qual cosa pot produir intercanvis interessants i augmentar les cites de l'obra publicada.

Confidencialitat de les dades:

  1. Constelaciones. Revista de Teoría Crítica garanteix que les dades que ens trameti sols s'utilitzaràn per atendre les seves demandes manidestades en aquest missatge.
  2. Les seves dades no seran cedides a altra part.
  3. Quan ho desitgi pot solicitar que les seves dades siguin eliminades dels nostres registres.Teoría Crítica